Skip to main content

Tina Packer on the Evolution of Shakespeare's Women

On the BBC websiteJane O'Brien interviews Tina Packer, the author of Women of Will: Following the Feminine in Shakespeare's Plays:
[Packer] says Shakespeare didn't understand women in the beginning of his career. 
Olivia Hussey in Franco
Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet.
"I think something happened, somewhere around Love's Labour's Lost and the early history plays and going into Romeo and Juliet. Either he fell in love or he just grew up, but something happened to him where he suddenly 'got it' about women and there was a profound shift in his writing," she says. "You see it in his first full blown version, in Juliet herself. Through her he began to take on what it meant to be a woman."  
Packer reckons it took Shakespeare about three years of professional writing to reach that point. 
The change is particularly noticeable when comparing Kate, the unfortunate subject of The Taming of the Shrew, to Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing.  
Both women are being wooed, but while the sparks fly verbally between Beatrice and Benedick, Kate and Petruchio get physical. 
"Beatrice and Benedick begin sparring, much like Kate and Petruchio do, but the outcome is so profoundly different," she says.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Packer says putting [characters like As You Like It's Rosalind and Twelfth Night's Viola] in trousers . . . allowed Shakespeare more freedom in creating important roles for them.  
Bryce Dallas Howard as Rosalind in As You Like It.
"They start becoming the characters in the plays who are telling the truth about what's going on," she says. 
"If they tell the truth and stay in their frocks, they're killed or they run mad and kill themselves.  
"But if they disguise themselves and go underground, they not only can have their voices, they can organise society and it all ends up terribly well," she says.  
In some plays, Shakespeare goes "goes into this dark place where the women want the same things as the men." 
"Think of Lady Macbeth, Volumnia in Coriolanus, and the eldest daughters in King Lear. What happens when the women are as ambitious as the men? It's terrible."  
Tina Packer says one of her favourite characters is Paulina in The Winter's Tale
"I love the way she keeps telling the truth, come what may, and is fearless." 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accurate List of Hamlet's Soliloquies

Though Hamlet's "To be or not to be" speech is his fourth soliloquy, many websites call it his third. They're skipping the twenty-line speech that follows his interview with the Ghost, which in my view is a particularly bad mistake since Hamlet's monomaniacal vow there is at the heart of his tragedy.

The internet's cosmic sinkhole of misinformation will never be filled, but it's worth throwing some dirt in when we can, so here's an accurate list of Hamlet's soliloquies, with a short description of where they occur and what they say, along with a few observations.

Shakespeare-Movie Soliloquies and Orson Welles's Chimes at Midnight

Directors usually handle Shakespearean soliloquies in three ways: (1) they have actors speak directly to the audience, as they would have on the Elizabethan stage; (2) they have actors speak to the air, as yammering on Bluetooth-enabled cellphones; or (3) they use a voice-over, as if we were wire-tapping the characters' brains.
Each strategy has its advantages.
Speaking directly to the audience works well for villains, who share their nasty schemes, preparing us to watch with horror as they dupe unknowing victims. The technique also allows for dark comedy: for example, Ian McKellan's Richard III and Harry J. Lennix's Aaron (in Julie Taymor's Titus) act as satanic stand-up comedians, terrifying us and making us laugh with the same speech.
Having actors talk to themselves produces a different effect, allowing us to pretend we're hearing a character's inward thoughts. This works in both comedies and tragedies. In a comedy, we laugh—or chuckle inwardly—when we hear Em…

Shakespeare and Stonehenge

The recent discovery of what may be Britain's largest Neolithic monument made me think about how strange it is that Shakespeare never mentions Stonehenge. After all, the place is near his hometown, and we know that he read Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, which includes description of how Merlin set up the stones as a monument to fallen Celtic warriors (157-160). We might expect Shakespeare to allude to that story somewhere in Cymbeline or King Lear since Geoffrey is his main source for both plays.

The idea that Celtic Britons, instead of people who lived thousands of years earlier, built Stonehenge has persisted; many people still think, in the words of Spinal Tap, that the monument was built by "a strange race of people, the Druids." This was the educated view at the beginning of the nineteenth century, when William Charles Macready used a Stonehenge-inspired set for his groundbreaking King Lear (St. Clare Byrne 189). Others directors have followe…